Vous n'êtes pas identifié(e).
- Contributions : Récentes | Sans réponse
Annonce
Si vous possédez déjà un compte, cliquez ici.
Pages : 1
#1 06-12-2009 16:02:54
- Ecrans.fr
- Administrateur
- Inscription : 25-06-2007
- Messages : 1 000
Hadopi : l?Espagne y va franco
Hors ligne
#2 07-12-2009 13:57:37
- nervusdm
- Habitué
- Inscription : 25-07-2008
- Messages : 967
Re : Hadopi : l?Espagne y va franco
Le pire dans l'histoire c'et finalement les artistes qui ont fait savoir leur grande satisfaction.
Quand je lis ça je pense à des termes grossiers à leur encontre..
Tutoriel ainsi qu'un Moteur de recherche de fond d'écran
.:. What We do in life echoes in Eternity .:.
Hors ligne
#3 07-12-2009 21:24:20
- bourgpat
- Habitué
- Inscription : 20-07-2007
- Messages : 241
Re : Hadopi : l?Espagne y va franco
Et pendant ce temps là au canada;
http://www.thestar.com/business/article … fringement
.......
The infringer has effectively already admitted owing at least $50 million and the full claim could exceed $60 billion. If the dollars don't shock, the target of the lawsuit undoubtedly will: The defendants in the case are Warner Music Canada, Sony BMG Music Canada, EMI Music Canada, and Universal Music Canada, the four primary members of the Canadian Recording Industry Association.
......
The claims arise from a longstanding practice of the recording industry in Canada, described in the lawsuit as "exploit now, pay later if at all." It involves the use of works that are often included in compilation CDs (ie. the top dance tracks of 2009) or live recordings. The record labels create, press, distribute and sell the CDs, but do not obtain the necessary copyright licences.
Instead, the names of the songs on the CDs are placed on a "pending list," which signifies that approval and payment is pending. The pending list dates back to the late 1980s, when Canada changed its copyright law by replacing a compulsory licence with the need for specific authorization for each use. It is perhaps better characterized as a copyright infringement admission list, however, since for each use of the work, the record label openly admits that it has not obtained copyright permission and not paid any royalty or fee.
Over the years, the size of the pending list has grown dramatically, now containing more than 300,000 songs.
..........
The class action seeks the option of statutory damages for each infringement. At $20,000 per infringement, potential liability exceeds $60 billion.
These numbers may sound outrageous, yet they are based on the same rules that led the recording industry to claim a single file sharer is liable for millions in damages.
After years of claiming Canadian consumers disrespect copyright, the irony of having the recording industry face a massive lawsuit will not be lost on anyone, least of all the artists still waiting to be paid. Indeed, they are also seeking punitive damages, arguing "the conduct of the defendant record companies is aggravated by their strict and unremitting approach to the enforcement of their copyright interests against consumers."
le monde en parle aussi ici.
http://www.lemonde.fr/technologies/arti … r=RSS-3208
ca va faire plaisir aux avocats de radioblog ce système de fonctionnement sur les droits utilisés par les majors depuis des années au canada.
Hors ligne
#4 08-12-2009 13:45:49
- oomu
- Habitué
- Inscription : 06-07-2007
- Messages : 249
Re : Hadopi : l?Espagne y va franco
je pense que pour que les politiciens puissent continuer à vivre de mes impôts tranquillement, faut supprimer internet.
on coupe les fils, ou on supprimer les abonnements des particuliers
allez, on éteint google
on interdit le cryptage
on supprime dns
on met des portails d'Etats, on interdit ssh, ssl, vnc, irc, ppp, msn, smtp, pop, imap, ftp, smb, afp, bt, etc.
on interdit , on supprime, on efface, on brûle.
-
bien sur, cela ne changera pas que je n'achète pratiquement plus d'oeuvres artistiques, ni je les pirates, et pire : je ne les écoutes pas. Désolé, c'est comme ça : je ne vous consomme plus.
Hors ligne
Pages : 1